Head-to-head
Relativity Space vs Firefly Aerospace
Which pays more, which is easier to get into, and which fits the work you want. Compared on the pay each states, the kind of company, where each hires, and the roles open right now.
Relativity Space vs Firefly Aerospace, in brief
, the SpaceJobs.Now board shows 384 open Relativity Space roles at a typical $88.5k to $163k a year (median $116k) and 121 open Firefly Aerospace roles.
Firefly Aerospace pays more on typical work (Stated per posting vs Relativity Space's $88.5k–$163k/yr typical (live median $116000)), a 83% chance on the rates the two boards state.
What we know does not show which of the two hires more of the people who apply. Both are launch & propulsions.
Both hire for Propulsion, Technicians, Mechanical, Avionics, Launch & Ops, and Systems & Test.
Right now Relativity Space has more live roles (384 vs 121).
Bottom line: Firefly Aerospace pays more, so pick Firefly Aerospace for the higher rate, or Relativity Space if its specific work fits you better.
| Relativity Space | Firefly Aerospace | |
|---|---|---|
| Typical pay | $88.5k–$163k/yr typical (live median $116000) | Stated per posting |
| Type of company | Launch & propulsion · Launch | Launch & propulsion · Launch and lunar landers |
| Kinds of work | Propulsion, Technicians, Mechanical, Avionics, Launch & Ops, and Systems & Test | Propulsion, Technicians, Mechanical, Systems & Test, Launch & Ops, and Avionics |
| Where it hires | Long Beach, CA; Cape Canaveral, FL; Stennis Space Center, MS | Cedar Park and Briggs, TX |
| Open roles now | 384 live | 121 live |
| Employee ratings | See its review | See its review |
Pay shows each employer's live measured band where its board has enough roles that state pay, otherwise our compiled benchmark. How we compile pay.
Best for people looking for Propulsion and Technicians roles.
See 384 open roles →Best for people looking for Propulsion and Technicians roles, with higher pay.
See 121 open roles →Relativity Space and Firefly Aerospace in our research
What the two employers' open postings on 2026-10-29 show, measured the same way for both by our space industry research, rebuilt every day. Every figure opens the row of the report it comes from.
| Measure | Relativity Space | Firefly Aerospace |
|---|---|---|
| Open roles | 384 | 121 |
| Share of all open space roles | 4.7% | 1.5% |
| Posted in the last 30 days | 153 | 121 |
| Kinds of work hiring | 13 | 11 |
| Open only to US persons or citizens | 2.1% | 100.0% |
| Name a security clearance | 1.3% | 6.6% |
| Take a diploma or an associate's degree | 5.7% | 5.0% |
| Name a master's or PhD | 11.5% | 34.7% |
| Postings that state pay | 100.0% | 0.8% |
| Median posted pay a year | $116,000 | n/a |
| Starter roles (internships, new graduate, entry level) | 45 | 24 |
| Starter roles' share of its open roles | 11.7% | 19.8% |
| Internships and co-ops | 0 | 11 |
| Ask for weekend work | 7.6% | 8.3% |
| Ask for overtime or extended hours | 14.6% | 7.4% |
| Name an evening, night or rotating shift | 4.9% | 5.0% |
| State a share of time traveling | 7.6% | 15.7% |
Weekly roles email
Space openings, sent to your inbox
The newest roles at every employer we track, with the pay each states, in one weekly email. Free, and unsubscribe anytime.
Only job openings, never promotions. Stop it from any email.
Relativity Space vs Firefly Aerospace: common questions
Which pays more, Relativity Space or Firefly Aerospace?
Firefly Aerospace pays more on typical work (Stated per posting vs Relativity Space's $88.5k–$163k/yr typical (live median $116000)), a 83% chance on the rates the two boards state.
Is Relativity Space or Firefly Aerospace easier to get hired at?
What we know does not show which of the two hires more of the people who apply. Both are launch & propulsions.
More comparisons
Sorted by the expected value of applying to the stronger employer in each pair. A referral agreement, if an employer has one, can raise it here but never changes its salary.