Head-to-head
Relativity Space vs Stoke Space
Which pays more, which is easier to get into, and which fits the work you want. Compared on the pay each states, the kind of company, where each hires, and the roles open right now.
Relativity Space
Stoke SpaceRelativity Space vs Stoke Space, in brief
, the SpaceJobs.Now board shows 381 open Relativity Space roles at a typical $88.7k to $163k a year (median $116k) and 74 open Stoke Space roles at a typical $108k to $328k a year (median $152k).
Stoke Space pays more on typical work ($108k–$328k/yr typical (live median $152000) vs Relativity Space's $88.7k–$163k/yr typical (live median $116000)), a 100% chance on the rates the two boards state, and its ceiling is higher too.
What we know does not show which of the two hires more of the people who apply. Both are launch & propulsions.
Both hire for Propulsion, Technicians, Mechanical, Avionics, and Launch & Ops; Relativity Space also covers Systems & Test.
Right now Relativity Space has more live roles (381 vs 74).
Bottom line: Stoke Space pays more, so pick Stoke Space for the higher rate, or Relativity Space if its specific work fits you better.
| Relativity Space | Stoke Space | |
|---|---|---|
| Typical pay | $88.7k–$163k/yr typical (live median $116000) | $108k–$328k/yr typical (live median $152000) |
| Type of company | Launch & propulsion · Launch | Launch & propulsion · Launch |
| Kinds of work | Propulsion, Technicians, Mechanical, Avionics, Launch & Ops, and Systems & Test | Propulsion, Technicians, Mechanical, Avionics, and Launch & Ops |
| Where it hires | Long Beach, CA; Cape Canaveral, FL; Stennis Space Center, MS | Kent, WA; Moses Lake, WA; Cape Canaveral, FL |
| Open roles now | 381 live | 74 live |
| Employee ratings | See its review | See its review |
Pay shows each employer's live measured band where its board has enough roles that state pay, otherwise our compiled benchmark. How we compile pay.
Best for people looking for Propulsion and Technicians roles.
See 381 open roles →Best for people looking for Propulsion and Technicians roles, with higher pay.
See 74 open roles →Weekly roles email
Space openings, sent to your inbox
The newest roles at every employer we track, with the pay each states, in one weekly email. Free, and unsubscribe anytime.
Only job openings, never promotions. Stop it from any email.
Relativity Space vs Stoke Space: common questions
Which pays more, Relativity Space or Stoke Space?
Stoke Space pays more on typical work ($108k–$328k/yr typical (live median $152000) vs Relativity Space's $88.7k–$163k/yr typical (live median $116000)), a 100% chance on the rates the two boards state, and its ceiling is higher too.
Is Relativity Space or Stoke Space easier to get hired at?
What we know does not show which of the two hires more of the people who apply. Both are launch & propulsions.
More comparisons
Sorted by the expected value of applying to the stronger employer in each pair. A referral agreement gives an employer a boost here, never a different salary.