Head-to-head
Firefly Aerospace vs Stoke Space
Which pays more, which is easier to get into, and which fits the work you want. Compared on the pay each states, the kind of company, where each hires, and the roles open right now.
Firefly Aerospace vs Stoke Space: the short answer
, SpaceIndustry.jobs lists 118 open Firefly Aerospace roles and 74 open Stoke Space roles (typical pay $108k to $328k a year, median $152k).
Stoke Space pays more on typical work ($108k–$328k/yr typical (live median $152000) vs Firefly Aerospace's Stated per posting), a 63% chance on the rates the two boards state.
What we know does not show which of the two hires more of the people who apply. Both are launch & propulsions.
Both hire for Propulsion, Technicians, Mechanical, Launch & Ops, and Avionics; Firefly Aerospace also covers Systems & Test.
Right now Firefly Aerospace has more live roles (118 vs 74).
Bottom line: Stoke Space pays more, so pick Stoke Space for the higher rate, or Firefly Aerospace if its specific work fits you better.
| Firefly Aerospace | Stoke Space | |
|---|---|---|
| Typical pay | Stated per posting | $108k–$328k/yr typical (live median $152000) |
| Type of company | Launch & propulsion · Launch and lunar landers | Launch & propulsion · Launch |
| Kinds of work | Propulsion, Technicians, Mechanical, Systems & Test, Launch & Ops, and Avionics | Propulsion, Technicians, Mechanical, Avionics, and Launch & Ops |
| Where it hires | Cedar Park and Briggs, TX | Kent, WA; Moses Lake, WA; Cape Canaveral, FL |
| Open roles now | 118 live | 74 live |
| Employee ratings | See its review | See its review |
Pay shows each employer's live measured band where its board has enough roles that state pay, otherwise our compiled benchmark. How we compile pay.
Best for people looking for Propulsion and Technicians roles.
118 open roles now →Best for people looking for Propulsion and Technicians roles, with higher pay.
74 open roles now →Some links on this site are referral links. If you sign up through one, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. It never changes what an employer pays you.
Weekly roles email
Get new space industry jobs by email
The newest roles at every employer we track, with the pay each states, in one weekly email. Free, and unsubscribe anytime.
We email new roles, not spam. One click to unsubscribe.
Firefly Aerospace vs Stoke Space: common questions
Which pays more, Firefly Aerospace or Stoke Space?
Stoke Space pays more on typical work ($108k–$328k/yr typical (live median $152000) vs Firefly Aerospace's Stated per posting), a 63% chance on the rates the two boards state.
Is Firefly Aerospace or Stoke Space easier to get hired at?
What we know does not show which of the two hires more of the people who apply. Both are launch & propulsions.
More comparisons
Ordered by what applying to these employers is worth, lifted by a referral boost for an employer that pays us a referral fee; it never changes what an employer pays you.